Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having an 81.9 score against 77.1. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Galaxy S8 Active has a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.