Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 474 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's general score of 77.1. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is way thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a quite better resolution of 2080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.