Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a little thicker and heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.