Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having a general score of 86.1 against 78.8. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen, a way higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 MP resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.