Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give very similar operating system features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a lot better resolution of 2080 x 2400px, a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch and a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.