Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a bit thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a much better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a just a bit better display pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 84 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.