Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.