Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having an 86.1 score against 82.9. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro body is just a bit thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 4a. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better 2080 x 2400px resolution, a bit higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 64% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.