Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 86.1. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and a little bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a higher 2080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro one, they have exactly the same internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.