Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's general score of 86.1. The Google Pixel 5 construction is just a bit thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a better resolution of 2080 x 2400, a just a bit better number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and Google Pixel 5 count with very similar storage to store more apps and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 5's CPU is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 5 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.