Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than the HTC One M9, having a score of 86.1 against 77.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a extremely heavier but somewhat thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
The HTC One M9 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a bit inferior pixels number in each display inch and a much smaller display. The HTC One M9 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has an 82% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.