Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than HTC U Ultra, getting an 86.1 score against 77. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is somewhat heavier and a little thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro both feature similar displays, because although the HTC U Ultra has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The HTC U Ultra has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 72 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.