Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a little thicker and heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution, they both have the same screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.