Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 86.1. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is just a bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, so it gives a lot of extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little inferior pixels amount in each display inch, they both have a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a worse video resolution and a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.