Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than Moto Z3 Play, with an 86.1 score against 76.3. Even being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is extremely heavier and thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a lot better resolution of 2080 x 2400. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.