Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 86.1 against 75.8. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a quite greater pixel number in each screen inch and a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots just a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with faster 30 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features just a bit better battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.