Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A30, with an 86.1 score against 79.6. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is a little thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy A30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a bit bigger display, a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a bit better number of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A30 features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a much better video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.