Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31, getting a overall score of 86.1 against 81.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's body is heavier but a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more MP. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.