Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A34, getting an 86.1 score against 82.9. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a little bit higher display density, a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a little bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A34 counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although the Galaxy A34 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A34, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.