Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a little thicker and extremely heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger display, a lot better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.