Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A50, with an 86.1 score against 83.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone than Galaxy A50. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 29% more battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.