Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A51's score of 85.5. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide very similar OS features. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A51.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little larger screen, a quite higher pixels density and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400. The Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.