Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 86.1. The Galaxy A52 is a just a little bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, but they are 0.33inches thick. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A52. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px. Galaxy A52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro have similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A52 has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a much lower 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light photography.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.