Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than Galaxy A70, getting an 86.1 score against 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than the Galaxy A70. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution. Galaxy A70 features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.