Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an overall score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro body is heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy A9 (2018). Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.