Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 86.1. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is extremely heavier but somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count per screen inch and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Fold has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has greater battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.