Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having a score of 98.9 against 86.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little heavier but a little thinner device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, providing you some extra features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little greater screen pixels density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.