Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Although it's the best in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.