Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's score of 80.4. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.