Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy Note7. Galaxy Note7 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note7 has a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.