Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, with a global score of 98 against 86.1. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little better battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.