Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 86.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite higher screen density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro feature extremely similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have a 108 MP resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little longer battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.