Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy S25, getting an 86.1 score against 82.6. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite lower display pixels density. Galaxy S25 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 count with incredibly similar memory for games and applications, they have equal internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.