Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 86.1. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, providing lots of additional features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a way better video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.