Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 86.1 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat thinner but heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.