Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8's 81.7 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S8 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2960 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S8 features a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.