Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy S8 Active, with a global score of 86.1 against 81.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's body is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy S8 Active. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per display inch. Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.