Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy S9, getting a overall score of 86.1 against 83.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a extremely heavier device than Galaxy S9, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy S9 has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2960px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy S9 has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.