Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's 86.1 general score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little higher display density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.