Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting a general score of 94.6 against 86.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a a lot heavier but thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give you very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.