Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's general score of 82.2. The iPhone XS body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. The Apple iPhone XS has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a quite smaller screen and a just a bit lower screen density. The iPhone XS has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.