Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a score of 82.2 against 80.7. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's construction is somewhat thicker and a little heavier than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL's CPU is very similar to the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a camera with much less MP, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.