Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 481 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Even being the best device in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
HTC U Ultra has a display that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's display, because although the HTC U Ultra has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. HTC U Ultra has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.