Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, having an 83.8 score against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit bigger display, a just a little higher display density and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.