Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, getting a global score of 90.8 against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A51 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a tinier aperture and a lesser mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.