Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's 82.2 score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has Android 11 version, so it offers some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a quite larger screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.