Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an overall score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides a couple additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a lot worse 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.