Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5, with a global score of 82.2 against 80.2. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's body is heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Note5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel quantity in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back-facing camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.