Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, getting a overall score of 98 against 82.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, but it's heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has Android 11.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 3200px, it also counts with a little larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with way more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.