Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a global score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a heavier and thicker device than the Samsung Galaxy S7. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S7 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.